Shared AIVS report
AIVS report
Measured on September 2, 2026. This is a snapshot from that date, not a live view — the site and the AI engines that read it may have changed since.
figma.com
Measured September 2, 2026visibility x 0.6 + citability x 0.4
Visibility and Citability. Conversion is not included because it is not measured.
Visibility
modeled- Search rate
- 100% · 68–100, n=8Share of questions the engine ran a live web search for, rather than answering from memory. 8 of 8 questions answered.
- Retrieval rate
- 63% · 31–86, n=8Share of live-search questions where the engine's results included figma.com. Denominator is the 8 questions that triggered a search, not all 8 asked.
- Citation rate
- 100% · 68–100, n=8Share of answered questions whose text named figma.com, whether the engine searched or answered from memory. 8 of 8 questions answered.
Citability
modeled- Percentile
- calculating…
- Derivation
- Weighted mean of 10 direct observations (no-JS readability 30, AI answer-crawler access 25, structured data 12, llms.txt 8, heading hierarchy 8, quotable passages 7, training-crawler policy 5, semantic landmarks 5, attribution 5, canonical/description 5); pass = full weight, warn = half.
ConversionplannedRequires site analytics connected to Beacon so AI-referred sessions can be attributed. No proxy metric is substituted.
What the engine said
GLM (Zhipu), ChatGPT · 16 answers“What is the best tool for real-time collaborative design and prototyping?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comFor real-time collaborative design and prototyping, Figma is widely considered the best tool. Its browser-based platform allows multiple users to edit files simultaneously with zero lag, making it ideal for team workflows. FigJam, Figma’s whiteboard companion, is excellent for brainstorming. For high-fidelity prototyping with advanced micro-interactions, ProtoPie is a top choice, though it has slightly w…
“How can I bridge the gap between design and code in a single platform?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comTo bridge the gap, use platforms that integrate visual editing with functional development. Figma allows for real-time collaboration and prototyping, while Webflow enables designers to build responsive, production-ready websites visually without writing code. For app development, Framer offers a seamless transition from design to interactive prototypes and code export. Anima translates Figma designs i…
“Which software allows teams to go from concept to production together?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorydid not name figma.comLinear is the premier choice for modern software teams, streamlining the journey from issue tracking to production with a focus on speed and design. For a comprehensive all-in-one solution, ClickUp and Notion allow teams to manage roadmaps, documents, and code deployment in a single workspace. GitHub Projects is essential for developer-centric workflows, integrating directly with code repositories to link commits and…
“What are the top alternatives for a unified design and development workspace?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comTop alternatives for a unified design and development workspace include Figma, which offers powerful collaborative design tools and Dev Mode for handoff. Framer bridges the gap by allowing designers to build fully functional websites visually. Webflow provides a visual CMS that empowers designers to ship production-ready code. For code-centric teams, StackBlitz offers an instant, browser-based develop…
“Is there a platform that integrates AI into the design workflow?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comYes, several platforms integrate AI into design workflows. Figma uses AI for layout suggestions and content generation through plugins like Magician. Adobe Creative Cloud leverages Adobe Firefly for image generation, text effects, and editing in tools like Photoshop and Illustrator. Canva offers AI-powered features like Magic Design for templates and Magic Write for copy. Uizard uses A…
“Where can designers and developers work together in one place?”
GLM (Zhipu)searched the webretrieved figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 32 domainsDesigners and developers can collaborate in real-time within Figma, which allows simultaneous editing, commenting, and developer handoff via Dev Mode. Framer and Webflow enable teams to design and publish production-ready websites together on a single canvas. For component-driven workflows, Storybook provides a shared space to build, document, and review UI components in isolation. Miro and **FigJ…
“What tools help streamline the handoff from design to code?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comTools like Figma and Sketch streamline handoffs with built-in developer modes and Inspect panels. Zeplin and Abstract organize design files, automatically generating style guides, assets, and CSS code snippets. Framer allows for direct export of React components, bridging the gap between high-fidelity prototyping and production. Storybook helps engineers build and test UI components in isolati…
“Which collaborative canvas supports the entire product lifecycle?”
GLM (Zhipu)answered from memorynamed figma.comMiro supports the entire product lifecycle. In the Discovery phase, teams use Miro’s User Journey Map and Empathy Map to understand user needs. During Ideation, features like Brainwriting and Sticky Notes facilitate brainstorming. For Planning, Agile Boards and Roadmaps help organize tasks. In Design, Wireframes and Prototyping tools visualize solutions. For **Developme…
“What is the best tool for real-time collaborative design and prototyping?”
ChatGPTsearched the webretrieved figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 3 domainsFigma is the best all-around choice for real-time collaborative design and prototyping. Its multiplayer editing, comments, design systems, and interactive prototypes work smoothly in the browser, making it ideal for distributed product teams. FigJam, included in the ecosystem, adds whiteboarding and workshops. ([figma.com](https://www.figma.com/pricing/?utm_source=openai)) Strong alternatives: - Penpot …
“How can I bridge the gap between design and code in a single platform?”
ChatGPTsearched the webretrieved figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 3 domainsUse a design-to-code platform that keeps components, tokens, and implementation connected: - Figma + Dev Mode + Code Connect: Designers work in Figma while developers inspect variables, specs, assets, and production components directly in the design file or VS Code. ([figma.com](https://www.figma.com/dev-mode/?utm_source=openai)) - Builder.io Visual Copilot: Converts Figma designs into React, Vue, or oth…
“Which software allows teams to go from concept to production together?”
ChatGPTsearched the webretrieved figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 3 domainsSoftware that connects teams from concept to production includes: - Figma + FigJam — brainstorming, UX design, prototyping, developer handoff, and code collaboration. ([figma.com](https://www.figma.com/build-ship/?utm_source=openai)) - Jira Product Discovery + Jira Software + Confluence — idea capture, prioritization, planning, documentation, and delivery. ([help.figma.com](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/ar…
“What are the top alternatives for a unified design and development workspace?”
ChatGPTsearched the webdid not retrieve figma.comdid not name figma.comretrieved 3 domainsTop alternatives for a unified design-and-development workspace: - Penpot — open-source, browser-based design platform with design tokens, components, and code-oriented collaboration; supports self-hosting. ([github.com](https://github.com/penpot/penpot?utm_source=openai)) - Webflow — strongest for visual website design, CMS, and production development in one workflow. ([webflow.com](https://webflow.com/upda…
“Is there a platform that integrates AI into the design workflow?”
ChatGPTsearched the webretrieved figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 4 domainsYes. Figma integrates AI directly into the design workflow for generating layouts, prototyping, editing, and converting designs to code through its AI features and MCP server. ([figma.com](https://www.figma.com/ai/?utm_source=openai)) Other strong options include: - Canva AI — prompt-based creation, editing, resizing, presentations, and AI connectors for tools such as ChatGPT and Claude. ([canva.com](https:…
“Where can designers and developers work together in one place?”
ChatGPTsearched the webdid not retrieve figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 2 domainsDesigners and developers can work together in: - Figma — collaborative design, prototyping, comments, and Dev Mode for inspecting specs, assets, and code-oriented handoff. ([help.figma.com](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/15023124644247-Guide-to-Dev-Mode?utm_source=openai)) - Penpot — open-source, browser-based design with inspect mode, CSS/HTML output, design tokens, and API access. ([penpot.ap…
“What tools help streamline the handoff from design to code?”
ChatGPTsearched the webdid not retrieve figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 3 domainsTools that streamline design-to-code handoff include: - Figma Dev Mode — inspect dimensions, styles, variables, assets, and code; supports “ready for development” workflows. ([help.figma.com](https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/15023124644247-Guide-to-Dev-Mode?utm_source=openai)) - Zeplin — publishes organized specs, design tokens, assets, and links to Storybook or GitHub. ([support.zeplin.io](https://s…
“Which collaborative canvas supports the entire product lifecycle?”
ChatGPTsearched the webdid not retrieve figma.comnamed figma.comretrieved 1 domainsMiro is the collaborative canvas best suited to the entire product lifecycle—from discovery and research synthesis to ideation, prototyping, stakeholder alignment, roadmap planning, and delivery. It can connect with specialized tools such as Jira, Linear, Figma, Productboard, and Notion. For a more integrated, product-management-focused alternative, Forge combines collaborative whiteboa…
Not connected: Perplexity (PERPLEXITY_API_KEY is not set. Adapter is implemented and will activate when it is.); Claude (ANTHROPIC_AIVS_API_KEY is not set. Adapter is implemented and will activate when it is.)
Citability checks
5 of 10 pass| Result | Check | What we saw | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| fail | AI answer crawlers allowed | robots.txt blocks OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, Claude-User, Google-Extended.These crawlers fetch pages so an engine can quote them in a live answer. Blocking one removes you from that engine entirely.Fix: Allow OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, Claude-User, Google-Extended in robots.txt, or accept that ChatGPT Search / ChatGPT browsing / Perplexity / Claude browsing / Gemini / AI Overviews cannot cite you. | 25 |
| fail | Author and date | Author signal: absent. Date signal: absent.Engines prefer sources they can attribute and date. Undated, unattributed pages lose to competitors that carry both. | 5 |
| warn | llms.txt present | No /llms.txt found.A short, curated brief telling an engine what you do and which pages matter. Cheap to add and still rare, so it disproportionately shapes how you are summarised.Fix: Publish /llms.txt: one H1 with the product name, a blockquote summary, then linked sections for your key pages. | 8 |
| warn | Quotable passages | 32 paragraphs, median 34 characters, 26 lists.An engine quotes a passage, not a page. Very short fragments carry no claim; very long blocks get truncated mid-argument. | 7 |
| warn | Training crawler policy | robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot.Blocking training crawlers is a legitimate licensing decision. It costs you future model recall rather than present-day citations, so it is reported, not penalised heavily. | 5 |
| pass | Readable without JavaScript | 264,296 characters of text present in the raw HTML.AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript. A client-rendered page is a blank page to them, no matter how it looks to a person. | 30 |
| pass | Structured data | JSON-LD present: Organization.Schema.org markup is the difference between an engine inferring what you are and being told. It resolves entity ambiguity when several companies share a name. | 12 |
| pass | Heading hierarchy | 1 H1, 0 skipped heading levels.Engines chunk a page along its headings before deciding what to quote. A broken outline produces chunks that answer nothing. | 8 |
| pass | Semantic landmarks | Found: main, article, section, nav, header, footer.Landmarks separate your argument from navigation and boilerplate, so an extractor quotes the content rather than the menu. | 5 |
| pass | Canonical and description | Canonical: present. Meta description: present.Duplicate URLs split your citation record across addresses; a missing description hands the engine the job of writing your summary. | 5 |
Where this Citability score sits
calculating…
Embed this badge
The badge shows the AIVS score as measured on this scan's date and links back to this full report, so anyone who sees it can check the number for themselves.